With some variation among the different disciplines, most scholarly articles of original research follow the IMRaD model, which consists of the following components:
Introduction
Method & Results*
Discussion
This form is obvious in scientific studies, where the methods are clearly defined and described, and data is often presented in tables or graphs for analysis. Many scholarly articles will also include an Abstract, a Conclusion, and a Bibliography.
*In other fields, such as history, the method and results may be embedded in a narrative, perhaps describing and interpreting events from archival sources. In this case, the method is the selection of archival sources and how they were interpreted, while the results are the interpretation and resultant story. Similarly, in other humanities fields, like English, a scholarly work will not include an explicit methods or results section. Still, some texts will ground the author's perspective in related theories (methods). The subsequent portion will consist of an extensive analysis supporting the author's argument, which will consist of close readings of primary texts supported by the incorporation of secondary sources (results). Such analyses in the humanities are typically broken into sub-sections that are organized topically.
In full-length books, you might see this general pattern followed over the entire book, within each chapter, or both.
Click on the image below to investigate the different components typical to an academic article in the social sciences and sciences.
"Anatomy of a Scholarly Article" by North Carolina State University Libraries is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution - Noncommercial - Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
© Florida State University Libraries | 116 Honors Way | Tallahassee, FL 32306 | (850) 644-2706